Wednesday, February 16, 2005
Scheer Simply Makes No Sense With This One
What We Don't Know About 9/11 Hurts Us: "Would George W. Bush have been reelected president if the public understood how much responsibility his administration bears for allowing the 9/11 attacks to succeed? "
Not surprisingly, Clinton's name is not in this or any other article about blame for 9/11. This argument is just in conflict with common sense and says that the person supporting it has only partisan goals. It is probably articles like this that helped Bush get re-elected, as the public, left or right leaning, couldn't stomach the idea of blaming a man after eight months in office without even discussing the man who had spent eight years there. I suppose it serves my party for men like Scheer to continue these ridiculous arguments, but I would prefer a higher level of discourse complete with common sense.
Not surprisingly, Clinton's name is not in this or any other article about blame for 9/11. This argument is just in conflict with common sense and says that the person supporting it has only partisan goals. It is probably articles like this that helped Bush get re-elected, as the public, left or right leaning, couldn't stomach the idea of blaming a man after eight months in office without even discussing the man who had spent eight years there. I suppose it serves my party for men like Scheer to continue these ridiculous arguments, but I would prefer a higher level of discourse complete with common sense.
